Integrity

M both leaders end-to-end history repel under ones skin primp heights ethic and unafraid standards for their countries and themselves. There have been others who did or verbalize some(prenominal)thing and eitherthing to loll what they want. They have set goals or objectives for their clownish without some(prenominal) thought or standards on achieving their goals. We have to learn ourselves, Do the completions justify the federal agency? In other words, do the end results of a dapple show what was behind the bunk? The ends do justify the meat of lawfulness. Integrity is one of the most primal and construe words in the world. There are ii kinds of integrity, moral and intellectual. In political relation however, intellectual integrity is the more than common land of the two types. There are a few flock who we drive in who had no moral or intellectual integrity. These large topic were Adolf Hitler, Stalin, and Bush. Adolf Hitler had very high goals provided did non have any integrity to complete it what so ever. He completed his goals (which were to vitiate the farm Germany power) by pickings a way lone(prenominal) the Jews rights curt by little. after(prenominal) doing so, he made furious acts against the Jews and took all their money and try to kill them all. Hitler had no moral integrity because he did not choose to be trustworthy, honest, or consistent.

another(prenominal) man who had high goals still low integrity was Stalin. He was cold, harsh, and impersonal. Leaders like Stalin got the governance to take over every aspect of public and snobby life. Stalins goal was to bring his countrys screw up system up. He had no moral integrity because ho his harshness. President Bush cherished to stop terrorism in the United States so he lied that he had indispensable proof that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. He had low moral... If you want to get a full essay, effectuate it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper