Tried as Adults

At the age of 17, Robert Acuna was convicted of killing two elderly neighbors, mob Caroll and Joyce Caroll. The young teenager shot them execution style as prosecutors exposit it (Liptak 1). Should this young man be assay as an adult? wherefore yes, of course he should be attempt as an adult. It is because of devastating nonethelessts wish well these why teenagers should be tried as adults when they commit violent aversions such as murders, rape, or robbery.Regardless of their age, a murderer is a murderer, a raper is a rapist, a thief is a thief, and they should be tried for the violent crimes they commit. To say, Hey, theyre just kids. (Lundstrom 5) doesnt take away a teenagers brooding and volatile childlike demeanor (Liptak 2). If an stripling criminal werent to be tried as an adult, they would later be released back into the society knowing they just got away with murder. Knowing this, it would fix them regain that if they did it once, they can do it a millions t imes.According to Adam Liptak, a journalist for The New York Times, Crimes committed by teenagers are often curiously brutal, attracting great publicity and fierce quests. For example, Lionel Tate was twelve when he savagely engender to death a six year old girl still didnt get tried and convicted as an adult until he was fourteen (Lundstrom 13). Some argue that the adolescent headland is non fully developed to understand or be capable of being tried as an adult (Liptak 6).This is a foolish argument because if Tate, at the age of fourteen, were to be tried as an adolescent and later released, it is very unlikely that his brain would develop for him to become a productive member of society. And in examining 1,400 males and females in four jurisdictions, researchers concluded that age and intelligence- non gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic factors or level prior run-ins with the law- were the to the highest degree significant factors in determining a early dayss ability to understand the judicial do work. (Kirkorian 3) From my stimulate personal observation, Ive spent time with mountain that have spent almost half(prenominal) of their vitality incarcerated and have noticed that they arent very well developed. soulfulness would easily be able to notice this by just just having a conversation with them because their clock times are so elementary-like with such a infinitesimal vocabulary range. In order for a brain to develop properly, a person needs to go through day to day life like go to school, make friends, work, and experience new things.Doing these things would be a flyspeck difficult if the person was locked in a tiny little cell wholly day, only getting roughly an hour of use up sunlight, and doing this everyday for years at a time. With this experience, it would only seem presumable as to why one would not want to let an adolescent murderer or rapist be tried as an adolescent. It would be too much of a risk to take to let a murder er back out into society. It would be too much of a risk to have a criminal of a violent crime be charged as a minor because they could later be released which could result in more lives, lost, (Lundstrom 3).According to Chart 2 adolescent Arrest Trends on murder, The 20% growth in the number of puerile murder arrests between 2004 and 2005 increased the number to 1,260 arrests People do not understand the serious threat that these criminals really are until they have had a bad incident involving these criminals within their induce life. For example, if person were to get assail by one of these criminals the victim would have to live with that for the rest of their life, and therefrom would cause them problems of their own. From their perspective, the age of their rapist would not make a end to the prosecution the criminal deserves.Once they have committed the crime, whats through with(p) is done. They have taken lives away they have taken moms, dads, brothers, sisters, grand mas, grandpas, aunts, uncles, cousins, and possible comparative or friend away from this world. Many see it as an nerve centre for an eye meaning that because they took a life, their life should be taken as well. Mr. Acunas youth should have been counted in his favor (Liptak 1). This statement is preposterous. in that location is no reason to kill innocent people, especially the elderly. Not only did he kill them, he decided to steal their car and think he was actually going to get away with it.Thats unstable Mr. Acuna should deserve to get convicted on multiple charges and a life sentence without parole. The say who prosecuted Mr. Acuna noted that, He was very nonchalant, and that, He laughed at inappropriate things, He didnt quite get the order of everything he did. How could someone who laughs at a murder they committed be even disposed(p) any signs of sympathy or remorse. There should be no tuberosity for age, race, religion, sex, social status, occupation, and languag e, even hair style when being tried for a violent crime such as murder or rape.Marjie Lundstrom, a journalist from The Sacramento Bee, might say that, They are not adults, however state in the same article that Weve created this image that teenagers are something to be feared, And the bigger the crime, the more eager we are to call them adults. (Lundstrom 5, 15, and 16). Although they are not adults yet, these criminals know rightfulness from wrong. According to Teresa Kellerman at FAS/E and Conscience Development, children depress to understand at the school age level how to Do the right thing to avoid punishment. and grow the desire to be a right-hand(a) girl or good boy. It is almost certain that these criminals thought about what they were about to do before they did it. Some kind of thinking process had to occur before these crimes were committed therefore these criminals intentionally murdered, raped, or steal knowing it was the wrong thing to do. Whether they thought the y would receive punishment or get away with it, they knew that it was wrong so should be tried for the magnitude of their crime regardless of their age.When on psychometric test and being convicted, someone would make do that the adolescent criminal may be incompetent to stand trial because they are emotionally or intellectually unable to contribute to their own defense but do these criminals take into consideration the victim and how they were most likely emotionally or intellectually unable to contribute to their own defense, (Kirkorian 1). It is not reasonable to why a judge or venire would be sympathetic, remorseful, compassionate, or considerate of the murderers or rapists feelings when they were not sympathetic, remorseful, compassionate, or considerate of the victims feelings. wherefore should people think about this criminals feelings and future when they, the criminals themselves, were egocentric and merciless when they raped or murdered someone, without thinking about the distress they could cause? When one person carries out a crime for suit a rape, it causes an enormous domino violence, a downward spiral effect that has an effect on more than one person. On almost all occasions like this, they have an affect the victims family members and finish friends. It could cause depression within members of the family.Being a victim of a rape could lead to later on drug abuse. Becoming a convicted rapist could ruin a marriage, the possibilities are endless. The Rape, Abuse, & Incest National Network embraces on their website that, 46% of rapists who were released from prison were re-arrested within 3 years of their release for another(prenominal) crime. Its because of statistics like these why it is dangerous to jeopardize the society by letting the adolescent criminals get tried as minors because they lead later be released and risk the possible chance of this statistic going up in the later years to come.Due to the fact that some people who do un derstand the magnitude of this hazard is why progress has been made. For example, most every state has moved to make it easier to charge kids as adults (Lundstrom 18) and government statistics, researchers said, show that 200,000 juveniles each year are tried as adults. (Kirkorian 11). report follows a decade of state efforts to make it easier to try children as adults. amidst 1992 and 1999, every state except Nebraska passed laws making it easier to for juveniles to be tried as adults and that, Twenty-three states have no minimum age (Kirkorian 12). eyepatch many may debate that these crimes committed by adolescents should only be given adolescent punishments and might say theyre only kids, or they are not adults, but these are not excuses to minimize the prosecution of a murderer or rapist. They were heartless and inconsiderate of the damage they were create to multiple people, so when being tried and thinking about their sentences, the judge should be just as heartless and i nconsiderate of the criminal because even though they arent adults yet, they know right from wrong.