Three Stikes Law :: essays research papers

Is the Three Strikes andYoure pop out impartiality cruel andunusual punishment?     The purpose of my research newspaper publisher is to analize how the Three Strikes Lawhelps to support our Constitution or violates it. I entrust discuss where the fairness camefrom and why we have it. I will similarly write about the positive and negative aspectsof the law as a whole. I hope to be able to analize the spirit of the law versus theletter of the law as it relates to this subject.     In 1994 California voters approved a vote initiative known as "ThreeStrikes and Youre Out." Basically what it means is that multitude who are convictedof three felonies may end up facing lifetime in prison. There are around limitationsthough on how this law is executed. Not any felony constitutes a postulate. For thefirst and second strikes only solid and violent felonies can count as a strike. Alsosome juvinille crimes can count. For the third stri ke any felony can be the terminalblow. While for the first two strikes it takes crimes like rape, kiddnapping, androbbery the third strike can be a crime as simple as carring brass knuckles.      This law was enacted in 1994 after Polly Klaas was kidnapped from aslumber society in her home and murderedby Richard Allen Davis, who had two priorkidnapping convictions. The jury recommended that Davis be sentenced to death,and the judge imposed that sentence. On March 7, 1994, Governor Wilsonsigned into law AB 971 (Ch 12/94, Jones) referred to as the Three Strikes andYoure Out miserable sentencing measure. In November, the voters reaffirmed themeasure by overwhelmingly approving Proposition 184, an initiative that isfundamentally identical to Chapter 12. The measure is the most significant change tothe state criminal justice system in more than a generation. Govenor Wilsonpassed this law as part of his goal to crack down on repeat offenders and redoubted felons. Th e case of Richard Allen Davis was the prime example of howthe law could be effective.